Comparison Solutions Between Lie Group Method and Numerical Solution of (RK4) for Riccati Differential Equation
Sami H. Altoum1, Salih Y. Arbab2
1Department of Mathematics, University College of Qunfudha, Umm Alqura University, Makkah, KSA
2Engineering College, Albaha University, Albaha, KSA
To cite this article:
Sami H. Altoum, Salih Y. Arbab. Comparison Solutions Between Lie Group Method and Numerical Solution of (RK4) for Riccati Differential Equation. Applied and Computational Mathematics. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2016, pp. 64-72. doi: 10.11648/j.acm.20160502.15
Received: February 17, 2016; Accepted: March 25, 2016; Published: April 15, 2016
Abstract: This paper introduced Lie group method as a analytical method and then compared to RK4 and Euler forward method as a numerical method. In this paper the general Riccati equation is solved by symmetry group. Numerical comparisons between exact solution, Lie symmetry group and RK4 on these equations are given. In particular, some examples will be considered and the global error computed numerically.
Keywords: Riccati Equation, Symmetry Group, Infinitesimal Generator, Runge-Kutta
The Riccati differential equation is named after the Italian nobleman Count Jacopo Francesco Riccati (1676-1754). The book of Reid  contains the fundamental theories of Riccati equation. This equation is perhaps one of the simplest non-linear first ODE which plays a very important role in solution of various non-linear equations may be found in numerous scientific fields. The solution of this equation can be obtained numerically by using classical numerical method such as the forward Euler method and Runge-Kutta method. An analytic solution of the non-linear Riccati equation reached see  using A domain Decomposition Method.  used differential Transform Method(DTM) to solve Riccati differential equations with variable co-efficient and the results are compared with the numerical results by (RK4) method.  solved Riccati differential equations by using (ADM) method and the numerical results are compared with the exact solutions. B.Batiha  solved Riccati differential equations using Variational Iteration Method (VIM) and numerical comparison between VIM, RK4 and exact solution on these equations are given. Lie symmetries are utilized to solve both linear and non-linear first order ODE, and the majority of ad hoc methods of integration of ordinary differential equation could be explained and deduced simply by means of the theory of Lie group. Moreover Lie gave a classification of ordinary differential equation in terms of their symmetry groups. Lie's classification shows that the second order equations integrable by his method can be reduced to merely four distinct canonical forms by changes of variables. Subjecting these four canonical equations to changes of variables alone, one obtains all known equations integrated by classical methods as well as infinitely many unknown integrable equations. We will consider in our test only a first order differential equation and the numerical solution to second-order and higher-order differential equations is formulated in the same way as it is for first-order equations. We have attempted to give some examples to the use of Lie group methods for the solution of first-order ODEs. The Lie group method of solving higher order ODEs and systems of differential equations is more involved, but the basic idea is the same: we find a coordinate system in which the equations are simpler and exploit this simplification.
Definition: A change of variables, , is called an equivalence transformation of Riccati differential equation if any equation of the form (1) transformed into an equation of same type with possibly different coefficients. Equations related by an equivalence transformation are said to be equivalent.
Theorem: The general equivalence transformation of Riccati equation comprises of
i. Change of independent variable ,
ii. Linear-rational transformations of the dependent variable
Example: Find the transformation of the coefficients of the Riccati equation under change of independent variable (i)
Solution: According to the chain rule of differentiation,
Upon division by and substitution it becomes
2. General Solution of Riccati Equation
The general solution of equation (1), we suppose is a particular solution for (1) and also assume the general solution is
where is unknown function and we seek about it by substitution the general solution from (2) in (1) we deduce:
The particular solution is solution of (1) so satisfying it, consequently substitute instead of in equation (1) we, get
so by substitution (4) in (3) we deduce:
It's clear equation (5) is linear equation from first order after solution we obtain and by choosing particular via (Trial and Error) we obtain the general solution
3. Solution of Lie Group Method O.D.E
A set of invertible point transformation in the plane
depending on a parameter is called one-parameter continuous group, if
Contains the identity transformation (e.g. at) as well as the inverse of elements and their composition. It’s said that transformations (6) form asymmetry group of differential equation
if the equation is form invariant;
Whenever . A symmetry group of differential equation is also termed a group admitted by this equation. Lie's theory reduced the construction of the largest symmetry groupto the determination of it's infinitesimal transformations:
defined as a linear part (in the group parameter) in the Taylor expansion of the finite transformations (6) of . It's convenient represent infinitesimal transformation (8) by the linear differential operator
Called the infinitesimal transformation or infinitesimal operator of the group with symmetry condition
The generator of the group admitted by differential equation is also termed an operator admitted by this equation. An essential feature of a symmetry group is that it conserves the set of solutions of the differential equation admitting this group. Namely, the symmetry transformations merely permute the integral curves among themselves. It may happen that some of the integral curves are individually unaltered under group . Such integral curves are termed invariant solutions
4. Canonical Variables
Equation (7) furnishes us with a simple example for exhibiting the symmetry of differential equations. Since this equation does not explicitly contain the independent variable , it does not alter after any transformation with an arbitrary parameter . The latter transformation from a group known as the group of translation along the . Equation (7) is in fact the general order ordinary differential equation admitting the group of translations along the . Moreover, any one parameter group reduces in proper variables to the group of translations. These new variables, canonical variables and are obtained by solving the equation
Where is the generator (9) of group . It follows that an order ordinary differential equation admitting a one-parameter group reduces to the form (7) in the canonical variables, and hence one can reduce its order to . In particular, any first-order equation with a known one-parameter symmetry group can be integrated by quadrature using canonical variables.
5. Numerical Method
We shall consider the solution of sets of first-order differential equations only. Users interested in solving higher order ODES can reduce their problem to a set of first order equations. Fortunately, the method of Lie group gives sometimes the solution of ODEs, but it’s difficult to obtain an exact solution. For that, we will use numerical methods to obtain a solution. Since the numerical method used to compute an approximation at each step of the sequence, errors are compounded at every step. We introduce the numerical method will be compared to Lie group method and we don't forget the comparison of the error at each example will be presented. In this context, we will use Runge Kutta-4 and Euler forward methods which is the most widely one step methods to solve
involves defining 4 quantities as follows:
here, represents our numeric approximation to solution of the differential equation at . The coefficients and are constants that we are going to choose shortly, and is the step size. Once one calculates given at the value of is given by
In this expression, the are constants.
Then we have
We recall that using M = 4, (RK4) the global error is .
6. Exact and Numerical Solution
In this section we solve the following examples by two methods, firstly symmetry group solution and secondly numerically-forward Euler method and Runge-Kutta methods. Finally we see the privilege and more effective of mentioned methods.
First: Symmetry solution
Consider Riccati equation
In this example we see the function is not define in . This equation admits the one-parameter group of non-homogeneous dilations (scaling transformation) , . Indeed the derivative is written in the new variables as , whence
Hence, the equation is form invariant. The symmetry group has the generator
The solution of the equation with the above operator provides canonical variables, from equation (11) we, get
In these variables, the original Riccati equation takes the following integrable form:
Then we, get the final solution of equation (13) is
Second: Classical Solution
Here we using given initial condition If is a particular solution, then is the general solution. Satisfies the Bernoulli equation
On the natural way, denote further to obtain the linear equation
Now we derive the solution of the linear equation
So the solution is , if then the general solution .
Figure 1(a) give the behavior of the solution using RK4, Forward Euler and Lie group technique. We notice that there is a big error occurs using forward Euler. Moreover Figure 1(b), Figure 1(c) and Figure 1(d) confirm our predictions that there is a small error between analytical and numerical solution using RK4 but there is no-convergence when one use Forward Euler method.
We see for even a moderate number of steps, the agreement between the Runge-Kutta method and the analytic solution is remarkable. We can quantify just how much better the Runge-Kutta stencil does by defining a measure of the global error as the
Where the method Clearly, the error for the Runge-Kutta method is several orders of magnitude lower. Furthermore, the global error curves both look linear on the log-log plot, which suggests that there is a power law dependence of on
Example 2: Consider the Riccati equation
corresponding to the choice . In equation (1) Show that the transformation is a one parameter Lie group of scaling symmetries for this Riccati equation. Use the one parameter Lie group to show that it has two invariant solutions
Use the method of characteristics to solve the defining Eqs. (11) for canonical coordinates. Show that
is a solution for .
Show that in these canonical coordinates the Riccati Eq. (14) reduces to
Integrate the last equation to show that in the original coordinates,
where c real parameter will be determinate using initial condition
Substitute , we get
For different to zero we have
Using , we can determine the value of
using we, get
Finally the solution is
Example 3 Consider the Bernoulli equation , when substituted into condition (10), leads to
This, again, is too difficult as it sits, so we try a few simplifying assumptions before we discover that yields
Because some terms depend only on , we solve to obtain . Inserting this form of ´ into the remaining equation , we arrive at . Now that we have settled on the symbols , we find canonical coordinates by solving to get and Remember that we seek families of functions that remain constant for so The second coordinate s is found by integrating to get The next step is to find the differential equation in the canonical coordinates by computing;
We learn that
Expressing in terms of and leads to , whence
This integrates to
Returning to the original coordinates, we obtain
Now from initial condition we, get
Finally we, get
Here, we compare the solution of the Bernoulli equation obtained using Lie group and the numerical solution given by RK4, see Figure 3(a). We see for even a moderate number of steps, the agreement between the Runge- Kutta method and the analytic solution is remarkable. We can quantify just how much better the Runge-Kutta method does by defining a measure of the global error e as the magnitude of the discrepancy between the numerical and actual values of y(1), see Figure 3(b). Clearly, the error for the Runge-Kutta method is several orders of magnitude lower. Furthermore, the global error curves both look linear on the log-log plot, which suggests that there is a power law dependence of on N. We can determine the power a by fitting a power law to the data obtained in our Maple code this leads that the global error using RK4 is this match our expectation that the one step error is .
In this work we conclude that, firstly the general solution of Riccati equation is facing the problem of (Trial and Error) and it is lead to the classical method. Secondly we used Numerical solution (Forward Euler, RK4) method and we find the Lie group method is better than classical method but it fail at the singularity. The numerical solution is accuracy than symmetry group solution and classical method. In the last, we note that the Euler method are tested numerically and we have not convergence and the determined the global error is about and this don’t match our expectation. The graphs in this have been performed using Maple 18.